Legal Opinion
In Re J.J.Z.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 16, 1993No. 90-FS-839, 90-FS-840 and 90-FS-861 to 90-FS-864PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Associate Judge:
These consolidated appeals challenge the trial court’s dismissal of neglect petitions filed pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-2301 (1989), upon motions made by the District of Columbia, over the objection of the court appointed guardians ad litem for six minor children. The government represented that its evidence was insufficient to meet its burden of proof in the cases involving J.J.Z. and M.A.Z. In the cases involving B.S., S.C., K.S., and R.S., the government cited as reasons for dismissal the substantial positive changes in the children’s mother’s living arrangements and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In re S.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re Petition for Adoption of J. S. R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re S.K.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Gray, William T. v. Poole, TheishaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- In Re Jam. J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In re M.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re T.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re AK. V.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.