Legal Opinion

People v. Balint

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 2006No. G034435PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARONSON, J.

A jury convicted Kelli Marie Balint of receiving stolen property. (Pen. Code, § 496; all statutory references are to the Penal Code.) She contends officers exceeded the scope of a search warrant for her residence when they confiscated an open laptop computer under a warrant clause authorizing seizure of “any items tending to show dominion and control” of the premises searched. We agree with the trial court that a laptop computer logically could serve as a container for information tending to show occupancy and control of the residence. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.

I

Fac…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. DurantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. Nguyen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. P. v. Thevenot CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API