People v. Balint
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
A jury convicted Kelli Marie Balint of receiving stolen property. (Pen. Code, § 496; all statutory references are to the Penal Code.) She contends officers exceeded the scope of a search warrant for her residence when they confiscated an open laptop computer under a warrant clause authorizing seizure of “any items tending to show dominion and control” of the premises searched. We agree with the trial court that a laptop computer logically could serve as a container for information tending to show occupancy and control of the residence. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.
I
Fac…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. DurantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. Nguyen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- P. v. Thevenot CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.