People v. Francis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that the court erred in denying that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress his videotaped statement to the police is without merit. The totality of the circumstances surrounding his interrogation at the station house, as revealed at a Huntley hearing (see People v Huntley, 15 NY2d 72 [1965]), supports the hearing court’s conclusion that the defendant’s videotaped statement was voluntarily made (see People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1, 13 [1980]; People v Hasty, 25 AD3d 740, 741 [2006]). The defendant was advised of and knowingly and intelligently waived his…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. CastellanosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. NixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BriggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.