Legal Opinion

Fessler v. Hannagan

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 26, 1991No. 1642 C.D. 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYER, Judge.

This appeal raises the novel question of whether, after a civil action commenced in a state court has been removed to and dismissed by a United States District Court, the plaintiffs may file an amended complaint in the original proceedings in the state court. We hold that removal to federal court deprives the state court of subject matter jurisdiction to consider the amended complaint even though the district court dismissed the action.

In 1973, the Wilkes-Barre Redevelopment Authority condemned plaintiffs’ properties. Since then, plaintiffs have filed numerous lawsuits in state…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Praisner v. StockerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Wenrick v. Schloemann-Siemag AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Redfield v. Continental Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Bloom v. DuBois Regional Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Duquesne Light Co. v. Woodland Hills School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Lynn, K. v. Aria Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Lynn, K. v. Aria Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Carlos Fernando Reixach Murey, as administrator of the Estate of Carlos Lens Fernandez v. City of Chickasaw, Michael E. Reynolds, Cynthia Robinson Burt, Arellia Taylor, and George TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023
  5. Marcus Willis v. Shelby County, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API