Legal Opinion
Norman v. Sundance Spas, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 15, 1994No. Civ. A. C93-0183-BG(H)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Keith Norman, moves to remand this product liability action to state court. Defendants, Sundance Spas, Inc. and Voyager Computer Corporation, affected removal based upon diversity of citizenship after the state court dismissed the only non-diverse defendant. Plaintiff argues two grounds for remand: 1) Defendants removed outside the one-year limitation period imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b); or 2) Plaintiff did not voluntarily dismiss the non-diverse defendant, a jurisdictional element of removal. After careful consideration of counsels’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- De La Rosa v. Reliable, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- McDaniel v. LoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Hernandez v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
- Caudill v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.