Legal Opinion
Wilson Research Corp. v. Piolite Plastics Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 16, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 62-586PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, Chief Judge.
This is a fairly typical patent case in which the plaintiff prayed for damages and for an injunction, and the defendant defended on the usual grounds of invalidity and non-infringement.
After trial, this court held the patent valid but not infringed and entered judgment for the defendant, 218 F.Supp. 145. The Court of Appeals, while affirming the finding of validity, reversed the finding of non-infringement and vacated the judgment, 1 Cir., 327 F.2d 139. Thereafter, on May 27, 1964, judgment was entered in conformance with the mandate of the Court of Appeals.
On June 29,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Butcher & Sherrerd v. WelshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. John R. Clark and J. R. Clark CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Hal Fulenwider, Jr., and Marion Fulenwider, Individually and as Co-Partners D/B/A Easy Glitter Wax Co. v. Elmer WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rhodes v. HoustonDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1966
- Dickerson v. Continental Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Dickerson v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973