Legal Opinion

Bontilao v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cnty.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 24, 2019No. H046157PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.

*986In this case we consider the timeliness of a motion to disqualify a judge pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.61 filed in connection with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner Arprubertito Bontilao brought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the superior court challenging a decision by the Board of Parole Hearings (the Board) denying him parole. Pursuant to Maas v. Superior Court (2016) 1 Cal.5th 962, 209 Cal.Rptr.3d 571, 383 P.3d 637 ( Maas ), Bontilao requested that the superior court inform him of the identity of the judge assigned to consider his petition.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wells v. One2One Learning FoundationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. RomeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In re CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  5. In Re ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gomez v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  2. Lorch v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Lorch v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. Mendoza v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. Super. Ct. (Reagan)California Court of Appeal · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API