Legal Opinion
Dew v. City of Florence
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 25, 1983No. 21930PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action brought under the provisions of § 15-53-10 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), as amended. Plaintiff-Respondent, Miriam L. Dew (Dew) alleged that her employment had been wrongfully terminated by the Florence City Manager, Thomas W. Edwards (City Manager). The trial court, sitting without a jury, ruled in favor of Dew. The City appeals; we reverse.
Dew began work with the City in January of 1975. She was promoted to administrative assistant to the City Manager in July of 1977. The current City Manager was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Rhodes v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- Bane v. City of ColumbiaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vaught v. WaitesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Toth v. Square D CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Eubanks v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Mills v. LeathDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1988
- Storrer v. University of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.