Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gardner Realtors, LLC v. Iteld

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 22, 2017No. 2016-CA-0415Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJenkins, J.

hi respectfully dissent from the majority’s finding that, because the Itelds failed to file a supervisory writ from the trial court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment, they cannot challenge those rulings on appeal. The denial of a motion for summary judgment is an interlocutory judgment. La. Code Civ. P. Art. 968. “But it is well settled that, although an interlocutory judgment may not in itself be immediately appealable, it is nevertheless subject to review by an appellate court when a judgment is rendered in the case which is appealable.” Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. City of New…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doucette v. GuientLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Wallace C. Drennan, Inc. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API