Legal Opinion
In re Runnels
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided May 11, 2015No. Case No. 13-30084PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO MODIFY PLAN
Laura T. Beyer, United States Bankruptcy Judge
THIS MATTER comes before the court on the Motion to Modify Plan Base to Amount Paid (“Motion”) filed by the Debt- or on May 12, 2014. The Motion says the Debtor’s confirmed Chapter 13 plan calls for monthly payments of $686, the Debtor was receiving temporary workers’ compensation benefits when he filed this case, the Debtor settled his workers’ compensation *627claim for $200,000 and payment of the medical expenses related to his injury, and the Debtor used a portion of the settlement proceeds to pay the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Clifford F. MacEvoy Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Calvin Tomkins Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ransom v. FIA Card Services, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re MatusakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Beard v. CreditorDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- Pli Y Hmok and Jane H Ngoan KsorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Riley John Beard and Regina Lorraine BeardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2023