Legal Opinion

Appeal of Sturm, Ruger & Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 23, 1984No. 82-228PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

This is an appeal pursuant to RSA 282-A:67,1 (Supp. 1983), taken by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. (the company) from an adverse decision by the Appellate Division of the New Hampshire Department of Employment Security, which affirmed an earlier decision of an appeal tribunal. The sole issue is whether the depart*508ment committed an error of statutory interpretation in awarding unemployment benefits to the claimant, Yolanda MacKay, after the company had discharged her. We find no error and affirm.

The claimant was discharged on October 8, 1981, allegedly for disruptive conduct. She applied for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Lemay v. RouseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Appeal of MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Appeal of City of Nashua Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Devere v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Appeal of New Hampshire Sweepstakes CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  4. Appeal of KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  5. Appeal of Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API