Legal Opinion

Zipperlen v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 24, 1907No. Civ. No. 380PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries. The verdict of the jury was in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of $4,125.00, and, agreeably to said verdict, judgment was entered in their favor for that sum. The appeal, supported by a bill of exceptions, is from said judgment.

The defendant corporation, at the time plaintiff, Mrs. Zipperlen, received the injuries for which reparation in damages is sought through this action, operated a steam railway through and over certain public streets in the city of Fresno.

On the thirteenth day of February, 1900, said plaintiff was traveling in a conveyance,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennichsen v. Market-Street Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Heckle v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. People v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Rystinki v. Central California Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API