Legal Opinion

John Doe v. Occidental Coll.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided July 2, 2019No. B282292PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDhanidina, J.

*1006FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

John Doe (Doe) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for writ of mandate. ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) He sought to set aside his expulsion from Occidental College after an outside adjudicator found he had sexually assaulted and engaged in non-consensual sexual contact with Jane Roe (Roe), another student. Doe contends he was denied a fair hearing and the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. For the reasons given below, we affirm the judgment.

I. Occidental's sexual misconduct policy

Occidental has a comprehensive…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Horn v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Nasha L.L.C. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alpha Nu Assn. of Theta XI v. University of So. Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  3. Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API