John Doe v. Occidental Coll.
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtDhanidina, J.
*1006FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
John Doe (Doe) appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his petition for writ of mandate. ( Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) He sought to set aside his expulsion from Occidental College after an outside adjudicator found he had sexually assaulted and engaged in non-consensual sexual contact with Jane Roe (Roe), another student. Doe contends he was denied a fair hearing and the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. For the reasons given below, we affirm the judgment.
I. Occidental's sexual misconduct policy
Occidental has a comprehensive…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Horn v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Nasha L.L.C. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Ryan v. California Interscholastic Federation-San Diego SectionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alpha Nu Assn. of Theta XI v. University of So. Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- Boermeester v. CarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.