Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Continental Insurance Companies

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 29, 1986No. 0852PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this declaratory judgment action, Everette and Michelle Thompson and Joseph Lester Faulkenberry sought a determination of the applicable limit of coverage under a policy of liability insurance issued by Continental Insurance Companies. The plaintiffs sought to “stack” the $100,000.00 limit of liability in a policy covering two automobiles. The trial judge ruled the liability coverage could not be stacked. The plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.

Continental issued a “Personal Comprehensive Protection” insurance policy to Faulkenberry and his wife. Two vehicles were listed as insured, with a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  2. Gambrell v. Travelers Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Kraft v. Hartford Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. BairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ruppe v. Auto-Owners InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Slack v. RobinsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Norwood v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  4. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. DawseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. Flagstar Corp. v. Royal Surplus LinesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API