Legal Opinion
United States v. Baker Hughes Inc., Eimco Secoma, S.A., and Oy Tampella Ab
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 6, 1990No. 90-5060PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge CLARENCE THOMAS.
CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judge: Appellee Oy Tampella AB, a Finnish corporation, through its subsidiary Tamrock AG, manufactures and sells hardrock hydraulic underground drilling rigs (HHUDRs) in the United States and throughout the world. Appellee Baker Hughes Inc., a corporation based in Houston, Texas, owned a French subsidiary, Eimco Secoma, S.A. (Secoma), that was similarly involved in the HHUDR industry. In 1989, Tamrock proposed to acquire Seco-ma.
The United States challenged the proposed acquisition, charging that it would…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Federal Trade Commission v. H.J. Heinz Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Dial a Car, Inc. v. Transportation, Inc. And Barwood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Federal Trade Commission v. Staples, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Federal Trade Commission v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.