Stoeckle v. Rosenheim
Court of Chancery of Delaware
The facts alleged in the original bill are set forth in the report of the opinion rendered on the rule requiring the defendants to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued, 10 Del. Ch. 195, 87 All. 1006, and the additional facts alleged by amendments and the answer of Rosenheim and Son, (the other defendants being formal parties,) as well as the allegations of the cross-bill, amendments and answer thereto, are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
The facts alleged in the original bill are set forth in the report of the opinion rendered on the rule requiring the defendants to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued, 10 Del. Ch. 195, 87 All. 1006, and the additional facts alleged by amendments and the answer of Rosenheim and Son, (the other defendants being formal parties,) as well as the allegations of the cross-bill, amendments and answer thereto, are sufficiently stated in the opinion. By agreement of counsel both causes were heard together by the Chancellor on oral testimony of witnesses and exhibits.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
In this case the original bill was filed June 24, 1913, and a rule for a preliminary injunction having *32been heard, "it was granted by an order made August 7, 1913, pursuant to an opinion of the Chancellor filed August 5, 1913, 10 Del. Ch. 195, 87 Atl. 1006. The facts upon which that opinion was based appear therein, and in the statement accompanying it, to which reference is made. At this preliminary hearing the decision was based on the mistake of officers of the Stoeckle Brewing Company in believing that the debt of Rosenheim and Son had been paid, and this was considered a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stoeckle v. RosenheimCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1913
- Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. FieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kennedy v. Emerald Coal & Coke Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
- Bodley v. JonesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1948
- First National Bank v. BoweSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. CACH, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Eastern Savings Bank, FSB v. CACH, LLC.Superior Court of Delaware · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.