Legal Opinion

Krystal Energy Company v. Navajo Nation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 6, 2004No. 02-17047PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Krystal Energy Company (“Krystal”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of its adversary action under the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 505 and 542, against the Navajo Nation, an Indian tribe. The district court based its dismissal on the Navajo Nation’s sovereign immunity to suit in the absence of explicit abrogation of that immunity by Congress. Whether Congress has abrogated the sovereign immunity of Indian tribes by statute is a question of statutory interpretation and is reviewed de novo. Demontiney v. United States, 255 F.3d 801, 805 (9th Cir.2001).…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Jeremy Meyers v. Oneida Tribe of Indians of WiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Timothy White v. University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Daniel Miller v. Chad WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. CoughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 2023

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API