Legal Opinion
MARTIN v. GRAY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 8, 2016No. Case Number: 114660PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
¶ 1 The issue in this review of a certified interlocutory order is whether the trial court erred by applying Kansas law to dismiss an insured’s claim of bad faith for an insurer’s failure to pay uninsured motorist (UM) coverage. This Court holds that Kansas law does not apply to this insured’s claim for bad faith and, therefore, the trial court erred.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Kourtni S. Martin (Insured) suffered serious injuries from an automobile collision in Oklahoma City with Nicholas L. Gray on May 31, 2013, At'the time of the collision, Insured "had UM coverage with Goodville Mutual…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Christian v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- McCorkle v. Great Atlantic Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Panama Processes, S.A. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Rogers v. QuikTrip Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- JOHNSON v. CSAA GENERAL INSURANCE CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- MEEKS v. GUARANTEE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Satterfield v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2018
- BD. OF CTY. COMM'RS. OF HARMON CTY. v. ASSOC. OF CTY. COMM'RS. OF OKLA.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2022
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.