Kelly v. Enterprise Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
■Appeal from Duplin, from order rendered by Peebles, J., at chambers in New Hanover, 14 April, 1911. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court, by Mr. Chief Justice Claris.
1Opinion of the Court
PLAINTIFF^ APPEAL.
Clark, C. J.
The question on tbis appeal arises upon the construction of the following reservation in a deed of 2 December, 1900, from the Cape Fear Lumber Company to the plaintiff : “It is understood and agreed by the parties to tbis deed, tbat the party of the first part hereby conveys to the party of the second part only the land with its agricultural privileges, together with all the necessary firewood and fence rails tbat may be needed on said land herein conveyed (until said timber is cut by the Cape Pear Lumber Company), to be cut from pine trees not over 14 inches in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hardison v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Warren v. . ShortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Mining Co. v. . Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Goldsboro Lumber Co. v. Hines Bros. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
- Whitted v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1854
3Cited by8 opinions
- Colleton Mercantile & Mfg. Co. v. GruberDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1925
- Hardison v. LilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Wiltz Veneer Co. v. AngeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Carroll v. . BatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- PALMETTO CONSERVATION FOUNDATION v. SmithDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.