Legal Opinion

Stonewall v. Danielson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 10, 1928PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKindig, J.

A statement of the facts is essential for an understanding of the issues involved.

' Charles, J. A., D. V., Oscar R., and Hilda F. Danielson, and Jennie A. Stonewall, the appellant (née Danielson), were brothers and sisters. Three of them, — that is to say, J. A. and D. V. Danielson, defendants and appellees, and Charles Daniel-son, now deceased, — went to Calhoun County in the year 1883, to commence their life’s work, adopting farming as their occupations. As a result of their efforts, they acquired approximately $100,000 of personal property and a section of land in the county of their…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Curtis v. ArmagastSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Mallow v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  3. Stewart v. ToddSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Stiles v. BreedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Frederick v. ShormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. Sinift v. SiniftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  3. In Re Estate of WinklerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  4. Switzer v. PrattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  5. Else v. Fremont Methodist ChurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API