Legal Opinion

Buzzell v. Bliss

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 4, 1984No. C8-84-529, C0-81-817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is a products liability action involving a punch press, manufactured by respondent E.W. Bliss [hereafter Bliss], on which appellant Lynda Buzzell lost parts of two fingers. A safety device had been installed by the employer, respondent Twin City Tool, but was not in use at the time of the accident. The trial court in 1981 granted summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer of the safety device, Safeguard Manufacturing. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Bliss, finding no product defect and apportioning 100% of fault to Buzzell, who appeals from both…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. KochSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Wefel Ex Rel. Wefel v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  3. Waite v. American Creosote Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Independent School District No. 181 v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Duck Ex Rel. Duck v. Modern Roadways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Broussard v. Houdaille Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. City of Burnsville v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API