Legal Opinion

McCornick v. Mangum

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Third District Court, Salt Lake County, Hon. Ogden Hiles, Judge. Action to recover possession of certain notes and contracts, for the appointment of a receiver to collect the same and to obtain a restraining order against defendants preventing their collection of the notes and accounts in their possession. From a judgment for plaintiff defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, C. J.

It appears from the record that defendants Mangum and Barter were engaged in business under the firm name of the Western Cycle Company. On August 15, 1898, the firm was indebted to the plaintiff, who was doing business as McCornick & Co., for a certain sum upon an overdraft at the plaintiff’s bank. The bank had also guaranteed the account of another company against the Western Cycle Co., for a considerable sum. On the date aforesaid, the plaintiff, becoming dissatisfied with the condition of the firm’s bank account, called upon defendant Mangum, who was the managing partner of the firm, to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hannaman v. KarrickUtah Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Valiotis v. Utah-Apex Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Wright v. Union Pacific RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Fissure Mining Co. v. Old Susan Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Whitmore v. Utah Fuel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Harter v. SorensenUtah Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API