Legal Opinion

Valiotis v. Utah-Apex Mining Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1919No. 3299PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tbird District, Salt Lake County; B. B. Porter, Judge. Action by Dan Yaliotis against the Utah-Apex Mining Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

PRATT, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by' him on October 10, 1916, while working as a miner 'for the defendant in its mine at Bingham Canyon, Salt Lake county, Utah.

Among other facts, plaintiff's complaint in substance alleges that on October 10, 1916, the defendant had provided as a means of ingress and egress to and from the working place of the plaintiff in said mine a certain manway consisting of wooden ladders extending vertically between two levels in said mine (the 1,300 and 1,200 foot levels) of a height of about 100…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. KunkelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Jensen v. Denver & Rio Grande Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Wilcox v. the Rhode Island CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1908
  5. State v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1909

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
  2. King v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Jensen v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Wellman v. NobleUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Perrin v. Union Pac. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1921

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API