Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Norton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1915No. 4516PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from County Court, Seminole County; T. S. Cobb, Judge. Action by Sam Norton, as plaintiff, against Charles Dunlap, as defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

On October 31, 1912, the case-made was filed in this court, on July 13, 1915, this case was due to be taken on submission, but the plaintiff in error has wholly failed to file briefs, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), and has thus abandoned the appeal. • , ■

We are, therefore, of the opinion that the case should be treated as abandoned and dismissed.

By the Court: It- is so ordered.

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BruceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  2. Board of Com'rs Okfuskee County v. HazelwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Kkk Medicine Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Dorsett v. State Ex Rel. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API