Legal Opinion

PACIFIC PREFERRED PROPERTIES, INC. v. Moss

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1999No. C028404PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

This is an appeal from orders after judgment denying a motion for an award of attorney’s fees.

The appellants, Kelvin H. and Leslie Moss (collectively the Mosses), were sued on cross-complaints by the respondents, Pacific Preferred Properties, Inc. (PPP), and NorCal Realty Partners (NorCal), for wrongfully foreclosing a deed of trust that the Mosses received as part of the consideration for the purchase of their house. After prevailing on summary judgments as to the cross-complaints, the Mosses sought an award of attorney’s fees predicated upon an attorney’s fees…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Super 7 Motel Associates v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Sweat v. HollisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Childers v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schumacher Properties, Inc. v. RellingerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API