Legal Opinion
Crooks v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 4, 2018No. Case No. 18–cv–0219 DMS (JLB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hon. Dana M. Sabraw, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s motion to compel *935arbitration. Plaintiff Taneesha Crooks filed an opposition, and Defendant filed a reply. For the following reasons, the Court grants Defendant's motion and stays further proceedings pending arbitration.
I
BACKGROUND
On October 30, 2013, Plaintiff purchased a used 2006 Nissan Armada from Kearny Mesa Toyota in San Diego, California. (Declaration of J. Tann Pace ("Pace Decl.") ¶ 4, Ex. A; Declaration of Taneesha Crooks ("Crooks Decl.") ¶ 4.) When Plaintiff purchased the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Camarillo v. Balboa Thrift and Loan AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Levine v. New York State PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022
- S.S. v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2021