Legal Opinion

Huikari v. Eastman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 15, 1972PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In 1959 Eastman sold some cranberries grown by him to Huikari. These and cranberries from other sources were then sold and shipped by Huikari to a canning company in four separate shipments. Huikari now seeks recovery for $6,102.25 paid Eastman for his berries included in the first two shipments, alleging the berries were contaminated. In a cross action Eastman seeks recovery of $2,166 for his berries included in the third shipment. There is no issue before us on the fourth shipment. A single trial of the cross actions in the District Court resulted in a finding for Huikari for $6,102.25 in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Butler v. CromartieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Duggan v. Matthew Cummings Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. James J. Derba, Inc. v. Hamilton Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ducker v. DuckerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997
  2. Lenco Pro, Inc. v. GuerinMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  3. Cambridge Chamber of Commerce v. Central Square Insurance Agency, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  4. Coyne v. John S. Tilley Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  5. Chiappetta v. LyonsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API