Legal Opinion
RAZAK v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 4, 2024No. 2:16-cv-00573Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALI RAZAK, et al. CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 16-573 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al. MEMORANDUM RE: MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW Baylson, J. June 4, 2024 Following a hung jury, both Plaintiffs (ECF 280) and Defendants (ECF 282) in this case filed post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are DENIED. The Court will convene a second jury trial as of June 10, 2024. I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiffs are three UberBLACK drivers that operated in the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Marra v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., in No. 75-2405 v. Videfreeze Corporation, and David E. Chinnery Development Corp., Inno. 75-2406Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Ali Razak v. Uber Technologies IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Parkway Garage Inc. v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.