Legal Opinion

Bell v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 28, 1993No. 1054, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

We approach the decision we are called upon to make in this case with the same discomfort with which we approached a similar decision in Dixon v. State, 23 Md.App. 19, 20-21, 327 A.2d 516 (1974):

“With the possible exception of the ‘dropsy’ cases, no aspect of Fourth Amendment litigation has afflicted law enforcement with the yawning credibility gap wrought by inventory searches.” (footnote omitted).

See also Manalansan v. State, 45 Md.App. 667, 668, 415 A.2d 308 (1980).

The appellant, Kevin Bell, was convicted by a Baltimore City jury of the possession of cocaine with intent to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. State v. HansonIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Epps v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Whiting v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Coley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API