Legal Opinion

Totten v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 8, 2001No. 02A05-0105-PC-224PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

Benard Totten appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief (PCR), by which he sought to challenge his convietion of three counts of robbery, two as class C felonies and one as a class B felony,. Those convictions were entered upon Totten's guilty pleas.

Totten presents the following restated issues for review:

1. Did the post-conviction court err in determining that Totten did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel with respect to advice concerning the penal consequences of convictions on all three counts?

Did the post-conviction court err…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wrinkles v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Kendrick v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Seay v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Young v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hyppolite v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API