Legal Opinion

Hyppolite v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 2002No. 48A04-0107-PC-00314PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBB, Judge.

Larry Hyppolite was convicted following a jury trial of dealing in cocaine, a Class B felony, and sentenced to twenty years incarceration. He initiated a direct appeal from his conviction, but subsequently sought and was granted permission to dismiss his appeal without prejudice to pursue post-conviction relief. His petition for post-conviction relief was denied. Hyppolite now appeals, alleging errors arising both from the direct appeal and from denial of post-conviction relief. 1 We affirm.

Issues

Hyppolite raises the following restated issues on direct appeal: 2

1. Whether…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. McCary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  2. Randolph v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Meadows v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Collins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Dawson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API