Legal Opinion
Capri v. Murphy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 31, 1988No. Nos. 1137, 1248, Dockets 88-7051, 88-7053PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs Daniel Capri, et al., and defendants-third-party plaintiffs C. Gordon Murphy, et al., appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Dorsey, J.), imposing liability on defendants for negligently promoting a coal-mining venture and dismissing plaintiffs’ claims under federal and Connecticut securities laws as well as the third-party claim against Gates Engineering Company (“Gates”) for indemnification. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the district court on the negligence claim, reverse the court’s dismissal of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Kyrtatas v. Stop & Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Schillner v. H. Vaughan Clarke & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Preferred Accident Insurance v. Musante, Berman & Steinberg Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re Morgan Stanley Information Fund SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Craftmatic Securities Litigation v. KraftsowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Royal American Managers, Incorporated v. Irc Holding Corporation and Joseph Ambriano, Cross-Appellants, Gerald Dolman, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.