Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Retirement Board of State Teachers' Retirement System v. Kurtz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1924No. 18329PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Is a county board of education required to pay contribution into the employers’ accumulation fund of the state teachers’ retirement system, upon receiving from the retirement board of the state teachers’ retirement system certification of amounts due from such county board under the state teachers’ retirement act? This is the question here before us. To decide this question requires consideration of the statutes involved.

The Eighty-Third General Assembly of Ohio passed an act “to provide a statewide retirement system for teachers in schools supported wholly or in part by public funds.” 108…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunwoody v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dunwoody v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arndts v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. First Nat. Bank of Norman v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Retirement Board of the State Teachers' Retirement System v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API