Legal Opinion

Dunwoody v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 2, 1887No. 15226PublishedCited by 10 opinions

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The following are the facts as found by the court: I. April 5, 1879, claimant was appointed by the National Board of Health the chief clerk of that Board, with compensation at the rate of $100 per month, dating from April 3, 1879. June 5,1879, he was nominated by the Board to the Secretary of the Treasury as disbursing clerk of the Board.

Read the full summary

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The following are the facts as found by the court: I. April 5, 1879, claimant was appointed by the National Board of Health the chief clerk of that Board, with compensation at the rate of $100 per month, dating from April 3, 1879. June 5,1879, he was nominated by the Board to the Secretary of the Treasury as disbursing clerk of the Board. June 6,1879, the Acting Secretary of the Treasury sent claimant the following communication: “ Upon the recommendation of the National Board of Health you are hereby appointed a disbursing agent of this Department for…

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The National Board of Health was established by an act approved March 3,1879 (Supp. Rev. Stat., § 480, and 20 Stat. L., 484), which provided for seven members, to be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, whose compensation, “ during the time when actually engaged in the performance of their duties,” was to be $10 per diem each and reasonable expenses; certain officers of the Government were also to participate in the work without compensation, and the duties of the Board were defined as being to obtain information upon all matters affecting the public…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. LangstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rust v. FitzhughWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Dunwoody v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. State Ex Rel. Retirement Board of State Teachers' Retirement System v. KurtzOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Spofford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1897
  5. People ex rel. Baumann v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API