Legal Opinion

Stansbury v. Bright

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1930No. 6561PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Woods, Judge:

The principal object of this suit, so far as the present appeal is concerned, was to require the Bank of Mount Hope to account to plaintiff and the C. M. Lilly estate for certain usury alleged to have been charged on a loan to plaintiff and C. M. Lilly in the sum of $15,000.00, as evidenced by their joint promissory note; and for the face value of a $15,000.00 note of Williams-Combs Coal Company, as maker. This latter note, which was secured by a deed of trust, was placed with defendant bank as collateral. The plaintiff contended that the collateral note, now considered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kincaid v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. McBee v. DeusenberryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Davis v. Davis Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Linger v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Smith v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cross v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Silling v. ErwinDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  3. Dwight v. HazlettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Morgan v. Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API