Legal Opinion

Furuheim v. Floe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1936No. 26122. En BancPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, C. J.

—Plaintiffs, a marital community, brought this action to recover damages from defendant marital community for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff husband as the result of an assault upon plaintiff husband by defendant husband. Trial of the cause to the court and a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs. From the judgment entered on the verdict, the defendants have appealed.

Counsel for appellants insist that, as appellant husband was acting in his separate capacity and not as the agent of the community, the judgment can be sustained only against…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Bortle v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bergman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Day v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Milne v. KaneWashington Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McHenry v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Mountain v. PriceWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Smith v. RetallickWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Smith v. RetallickWashington Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API