Legal Opinion

Smith v. Retallick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1956No. 33364Published

1Opinion of the Court

48 Wn.2d 360 (1956)

293 P.2d 745

DAVID SMITH, by his Guardian ad Litem, OLIVER SMITH, Respondent,

v.

JOSEPH A. RETALLICK et al., Appellants.[1]

No. 33364.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

February 16, 1956.

Patrick M. Steele, for appellants.

Peters & Witt, for respondent.

DONWORTH, J.

This appeal is primarily concerned with the community's liability for the husband's tort.

On the evening of June 24, 1954, defendant husband drove the community automobile south from Tacoma on the mountain highway to visit a friend who was then employed at a service station which was located at about 148th…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McDonald v. SennNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Bergman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. LaFramboise v. SchmidtWashington Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API