Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robinson v. Schriro

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2010No. 05-99007Published

1DissentRawlinson, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. The record in this case supports the district court’s determination that Fred Robinson’s claim challenging application of the cruelty prong of the “cruel, heinous and depraved” aggravating factors under Arizona’s death penalty statute is procedurally barred. Although a closer question is presented by application of the heinous/depraved prongs of the statutory aggravating factors, the Arizona state courts did not act arbitrarily and capriciously in applying the heinous/depraved prongs of the statutory aggravating factors when considering the facts underlying the murder…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lewis v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Wong v. BelmontesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Terry Allen Langford v. Rick Day, Acting Administrator of Corrections Division Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General of the State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. Bobby v. Van HookSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API