State v. Phillips
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice:
Each of the three named defendants was convicted by the Ogden City Court of distributing pornographic materials from the Adult Book and Cinema Store in Ogden, in violation of Section 76-10-1204, U.C.A. 1953. On appeal to the district court, their *938convictions were affirmed; and because of the constitutional issue, they appeal to this court.1
Defendants have • made no contention that the materials were not pornographic, but concede that fact. Their defense is that our statutes are unconstitutional. Pornographic material as proscribed in the section referred to is defined in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Paris Adult Theatre I v. SlatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Super 8MM. FilmSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. OhmsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Peatross v. Board of Commissioners of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1976
- Eagle Books, Inc. v. RitchieDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1978
- Eagle Books, Inc. v. RitchieDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.