Legal Opinion

SHICK v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 26, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00253Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LINDA SHICK and RUSSELL SHICK, ) Case No. 3:18-cv-253 ) Plaintiffs, ) JUDGE KIM R. GIBSON ) v. ) ) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS, JOHN E. WETZEL, ) MICHAEL R. CLARK, and RYAN ) SLEWISKI, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (ECF No. 5.) This Motion is fully briefed (see ECF Nos. 6, 21) and is ripe for disposition. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. Background Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API