Legal Opinion

Haas v. Haas

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1984No. 13164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUS, Presiding Judge.

A warranty deed named as grantees the following: “Elmer Haas & Georgia Haas, husband and wife; Monte Haas, single and Patricia Lister, single.” After the description, it stated, “It is the intention of this deed to vest in the grantees Elmer Haas & Georgia Haas, h/w an undivided ½ interest in said real estate and in Monte Haas, an undivided xk interest in said real estate and in Patricia Lister an undivided ½ interest in *594said real estate.” Monte Haas and Patricia Lister, the plaintiffs-respondents, were thereafter married. The marriage of Elmer Haas and Georgia Haas was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fulton v. FultonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Bender Ex Rel. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  3. Ferguson v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prange v. PrangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Ham v. HamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API