Ham v. Ham
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
The judge found a resulting trust, constructive trust, and an express oral trust in this real estate matter. On appeal only the conclusion of a resulting trust is examined, since if the trial court’s judgment is sustainable on any grounds it is to be affirmed. Drydale v. Kiser, 413 S.W.2d 506, 507 (Mo.1967); Connell v. Baker, 458 S.W.2d 573, 577 (Mo.App.1970). The burden is on the party seeking the establishment of a resulting trust, and proof must be by clear and convincing evidence to exclude all doubt from the mind of the court. Dallas v. Dallas, 670 S.W.2d 535, 538…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Ravenscroft v. RavenscroftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Adams v. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Davis v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Drydale v. KiserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matlock v. MatlockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Duncan v. RayfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Helena Chemical Co. v. True (In Re True)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2002
- Tomasovic v. TomasovicMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992