Legal Opinion
Sommer v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided February 20, 1959No. 58C91(3)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
171 F.Supp. 84 (1959)
Conrad SOMMER, Plaintiff,
v.
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant.
No. 58C91(3).
United States District Court E. D. Missouri, E. D.
February 20, 1959.
Kenneth Teasdale, Cobbs, Armstrong, Teasdale & Roos, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff.
J. C. Jaeckel, Moser, Marsalek, Carpenter, Cleary, Jaeckel & Hamilton, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant.
WEBER, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court upon cross Motions for Summary Judgment filed by both parties under Rule 56. A brief review of the factual situation and the pleadings is necessary for the purposes of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., Limited v. Youghiogheny & Ohio CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Heyward v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1955
- Physicians' & Dentists' Business Bureau v. DrayWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Shehee v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1954
- Bakewell v. KahleMontana Supreme Court · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Narional Surety Corporation v. W. T. Musgrove and William R. Cadenhead, Individually and as Partners Doingbusiness as Musgrove Insurance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Oak River Insurance Company v. Herman TruittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- COMMERCE NAT. BK., LAKE WORTH v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Hullverson Law Firm, P.C. v. Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
- Continental Casualty Co. v. ReedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.