Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Reed

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 9, 1969No. 3-68-Civ-213PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DEYITT, Chief Judge.

The basic issue posed by this Declaratory Judgments action seeking construction of an “errors and omissions” insurance policy covering the defendant corporate insurance agency is whether the claimed misconduct of the insured is excluded from coverage by the clause of the policy which excludes liability caused by the “dishonest, fraudulent, criminal and malicious action or omission of the insured.”

The jurisdictional requirements are met by the diversity of citizenship of the parties, and the requisite amount in controversy.

Plaintiff issued the “errors…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cagle v. Commercial Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Egg Shippers' Strawboard & Filler Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Ford Hospital v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Harris v. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sutherland v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Golf Course Superintendents Ass'n of America v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. O'BRIENDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1974
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. EvensonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API