Legal Opinion

Pitt v. Keenan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1928No. 27,760PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

On February 25,1926, Robert Pitt sued H. H. Keenan and T. M. Thomas, doing business as the Thomas. Investment Company, and H. F. G. Wulf to recover damages for the alleged fraudulent obtaining of the possession of 41% shares of Monarch Cement Company stock, owned by Pitt, of the value of $4,180, and giving him in exchange therefor stock of the Vitek Oil Company, alleged to be of little, if any, value. Plaintiff pleaded that Keenan and one Whittam applied to him on April 10, 1923, for permission to sell his cement stock. He first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beneke v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  2. Ireland v. WaymireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Cleaves v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Jackson v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Hamilton v. McGinnisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sluss v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  2. Davidson v. McKownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Baron v. LymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Decock v. O'ConnellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  5. Bonesteel v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API