In re Guardianship of Wonderly
Ohio Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHolmes, J.
I concur in that portion of the majority opinion which denies counsel fees in the proceedings commenced by the Wonderlys in the state of Indiana. I must dissent, however, from that portion of the opinion which reaches the same conclusion as to the fees incurred in the litigation which was initiated in the Probate Court of Defiance County.
It would seem reasonable that even though not specifically provided for by statute, the guardian of the person of a ward should be able to bring and defend legal actions which relate to the maintenance, support and welfare of the ward. This would be a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re Guardianship of WonderlyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- In re TillmanDarke County Probate Court · 1956
- Spencer v. SpenceOhio Court of Appeals · 1948