Legal Opinion
Scott v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 22, 1985No. C-85-5706 RFPPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PECKHAM, Chief Judge.
This case arises from a petition of the Regional Director of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) for issuance of a preliminary injunction under § 10(Z) of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA” or the “Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 160(Z), against Local 70 of the Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers (“Teamsters”) to enjoin activity allegedly proscribed by NLRA § 8(b)(4)(B), 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4)(B). The petition alleges that two forms of picketing by the Teamsters violate this “secondary boycott” provision of the Act. The first consists of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Jacksonville Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fruit & Vegetable Packers & Warehousemen, Local 760Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Checker Taxi Co. v. National Production Workers UnionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Chipman Freight Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Production Workers Union Of Chicago And Vicinity, Local 707, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Production Workers Union of Chicago & Vicinity, Local 707 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Chipman Freight Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988