Bell v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PULLEN, J., pro tem.
This is an action to recover from the respondent County of Los Angeles the sum of $370 paid to the tax' collector of said county.
A parcel of real property was assessed for taxes in the name of Herman Heaeker for the years 1917, 1918, 1919, 1920, 1921, and 1922. The taxes for the year 1917 were not paid and in 1918 there was noted on the assessment-roll opposite the property “sold to the State.”
In July, 1922, the tax collector, pursuant to the provisions of section 3771a of the Political Code, offered the property for sale at public auction. In the course of the bidding…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lisso & Bro. v. Police JurySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Brooks v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Schultz v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Franchise Tax Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Craland, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.