United States v. Willie Dillard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Willie Allen Dillard challenges the district court’s decision to apply the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) enhancement at his sentencing on his conviction of felon-in-possession of a firearm. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(1), and we affirm.
Dillard’s basic contention is that one of the predicate convictions supporting the district court’s application of the ACCA enhancement — a conviction obtained when Dillard was seventeen years old after a Nevada juvenile court had certified him to be tried as an adult — is not a “prior conviction”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Shannon Wayne TigheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Roberto A. Miguel, United States of America v. Bryson JoseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. VallesColorado Court of Appeals · 2013