Legal Opinion

Ball v. Park MGM Casino, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 28, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01753Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 WILLIAM H. BALL, Case No. 2:24-cv-01753-CDS-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 v. 10 PARK MGM CASINO, LLC, 11 Defendant(s). 12 The Court has a duty to ensure that it has subject matter jurisdiction over the dispute before 13 it, an issue it may raise at any time during the proceedings. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).1 14 Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and possess only that power authorized by the 15 Constitution and statute. See Rasul v. Bush,

542 U.S. 466, 489

(2004). “A federal court is 16 presumed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Rasul v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Wendell Lyons Donald Tate Robert L. Claiborne Rosevelt Willson v. Gordon R. England, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Stock West, Inc. v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. McCauley v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API